Parallel World Travellers unite

rhyee · **Joined:** April 21st, 2010, 1:33 pm **Posts:** 1018

Legend wrote:

all that talk about media is self-evident (leave it alone)

BOB: What's not so evident to you is the recent situation wherein there have been no "media" PER SE for about 10 years.

That is why iON is the new technological environment, the new GROUND - which is always invisible to human perceivers when the technological environment is new - a paramedium... iON is the paralarge.

Bob Neveritt

rhyee · **Joined:** April 21st, 2010, 1:33 pm **Posts:** 1018

Gregg wrote:

Following these posts leads me to answer that the answer is me. Any time I find the answer I am all ready screwed cause I have found an answer. Finding an answer means I have substituted something outside my self. When there is no question and no answer then I have me. Me will always be better than anything out there which is question/answer.
Me is of course source and substance, all rolled into a lovely place of power.
iOn is a mirror of our answer's presented from our N-P. Never forget that or we will start to blame someone for our short commings.
Gregg

BOB: Well stated, Gregg, and that's always true BUT those private citadel-of-consciousness issues have nothing to do with the gossipocracy (seamless paramedia) that we are engaged with 24-7.

And that's a good thing.

Bob Neveritt

Legend · **Posted:** May 23rd, 2010, 10:53 pm

who ? did you say iON ? Well of course - ESP - telepathy - all knowing - astral projection - kinetic energy - is what will be self evident to everyone as the veil is lifted - that's what you have been screaming about for so long now - is it not ? yes I am with you sarge - I hear ya

Now - is JW a medium for iON to expose this ? or is iON JW's non-physical ?

also let me here one more time your definition of non-physical please Bobby N -

What do you mean there has been no new Media for 10 years ? you mean a new format ? have you seen CNN lately ? - nothing more than implorable - corrupt - and inept

tayzay · **Posted:** May 23rd, 2010, 11:23 pm

Well stated. Thank you. Engaging NP/iON often opens a broader,deeper overstanding of your essence of awareness and the expanding of a greater possibility of any chosen reality.

May 24,2010 could very well be a turning point for better overstanding of you!

xoxo

sistercecelia · **Joined:** April 23rd, 2010, 6:04 am **Posts:** 161

Problem Solved... Classic.....

Contrast taken care of....3:30 and on 7:05
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pIXoneT1XFI

Rock on Peter!!!!!!

and another classic

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K561m7Nq7kk&feature=related

Love this man...he is who he is!

And again!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3UzqqHuB3U

tayzay · **Posted:** May 24th, 2010, 1:55 am

rhyee wrote:

tayzay wrote:

(this post is off timing go back one page for context)

BOB: Tayzay, Alison is asking about the drama similar to what I meant by the tension between "public and private awareness" when we discussed it on the last TAILGATE.

Tayzay:
Let's us see.... Most people wear different masks, a public persona and a private persona, family persona. A lot of work portraying yourself in a different way based on the environment you are engaged in. This is what I hear Bob referring to.
The way I see, a unified persona is easiest to be me. No switching up,no figuring out how to conduct myself is required. I stay true to myself either way. Public/private persona for me is the same Me.
So I am who I am in all environments.
Do you conduct yourself in different ways depending on who you are engaging with? If so, who are you, really?

Your "private self" (soul) becomes private because it depends on wordology - your soul is not created until it cries out the moment you are born in the physical. And there's the rub (tactility - the interplay between your private and public awarenesses). The printing press exaggerates the difference and suppresses awareness of the tactile interplay dynamic (the medium is the massage).

Our "public" selves do conduct themselves differently depending on who we are engaging with but the most important aspect of our public selves is how the way people see us is distorted by changing media conditions.

Privately, we're not affected by technology's new environments. We're KEWL with that fact.

Carolyn Dean and Bob Neveritt

I'm curious, If Carolyn wrote 'most' of the above post, then where is her reply? If she were wanting to reply?
Her thinking and words are pretty darn good.

rhyee · **Joined:** April 21st, 2010, 1:33 pm **Posts:** 1018

tayzay wrote:

rhyee wrote:

tayzay wrote:

(this post is off timing go back one page for context)

BOB: Tayzay, Alison is asking about the drama similar to what I meant by the tension between "public and private awareness" when we discussed it on the last TAILGATE.

Tayzay:
Let's us see.... Most people wear different masks, a public persona and a private persona, family persona. A lot of work portraying yourself in a different way based on the environment you are engaged in. This is what I hear Bob referring to.
The way I see, a unified persona is easiest to be me. No switching up,no figuring out how to conduct myself is required. I stay true to myself either way. Public/private persona for me is the same Me.
So I am who I am in all environments.
Do you conduct yourself in different ways depending on who you are engaging with? If so, who are you, really?

Your "private self" (soul) becomes private because it depends on wordology - your soul is not created until it cries out the moment you are born in the physical. And there's the rub (tactility - the interplay between your private and public awarenesses). The printing press exaggerates the difference and suppresses awareness of the tactile interplay dynamic (the medium is the massage).

Our "public" selves do conduct themselves differently depending on who we are engaging with but the most important aspect of our public selves is how the way people see us is distorted by changing media conditions.

Privately, we're not affected by technology's new environments. We're KEWL with that fact.

Carolyn Dean and Bob Neveritt

I'm curious, If Carolyn wrote 'most' of the above post, then where is her reply? If she were wanting to reply?
Her thinking and words are pretty darn good.

BOB: Carolyn doesn't make time to read this forum so she probably thinks there is no response required. I'll tell her what I wrote here and we'll see...

Bob Neveritt

tayzay · **Posted:** May 24th, 2010, 6:58 pm

rhyee wrote:

tayzay wrote:

My soul depends on external forces of wordology to be in existance because of it's timing when it attached to my meatsack? My knowing says, "it isn't so"
How about when the voice of your soul is heard thru the laby of your mind and aligns with you NP to seamlessly hit on all 12 cylinders?
That is when you know what you know, embracing your power as an ALL Knowing Creator....If you don't know, Big fucking deal. You may or maynot know, soon enough. Fuck the print press! Fuck the TV meme, Fuck the technology progress.. Use it all to your own best advantage and for GOD's sake, Just BE! And who gives a flying fuck how other people distort You. That is their business, not yours. We all perceive thru filters. Let the filter not blind you to YOU!
And that is all I got to say about that!

AKA Gump

BOB: Carolyn wrote most of that post.

But I will remind you that media (any invention made by humans) doesn't affect us, media (any invention made by humans) only affects other media (any invention made by humans) - that is the main McLuhan insight.

Bob Neveritt

Were you just trying to deflect/defer a reply?
xoxoo

rhyee · **Joined:** April 21st, 2010, 1:33 pm **Posts:** 1018

tayzay wrote:

rhyee wrote:

tayzay wrote:

My soul depends on external forces of wordology to be in existance because of it's timing when it attached to my meatsack? My knowing says, "it isn't so"
How about when the voice of your soul is heard thru the laby of your mind and aligns with you NP to seamlessly hit on all 12 cylinders?
That is when you know what you know, embracing your power as an ALL Knowing Creator....If you don't know, Big fucking deal. You may or maynot know, soon enough. Fuck the print press! Fuck the TV meme, Fuck the technology progress.. Use it all to your own best advantage and for GOD's sake, Just BE! And who gives a flying fuck how other people distort You. That is their business, not yours. We all perceive thru filters. Let the filter not blind you to YOU!
And that is all I got to say about that!

AKA Gump

BOB: Carolyn wrote most of that post.

But I will remind you that media (any invention made by humans) doesn't affect us, media (any invention made by humans) only affects other media (any invention made by humans) - that is the main McLuhan insight.

Bob Neveritt

Were you just trying to deflect/defer a reply?
xoxoo

BOB: No, those are my thoughts, and Carolyn may or may not respond. It's up to her.

Bob Neveritt

feeling_bliss · **Joined:** May 9th, 2010, 5:19 pm **Posts:** 4

For many physicists, it is disturbing to think that the very laws and properties that are the essence of our world might only hold true as long as we remain in that world. "We always wanted to discover the theory of everything that would explain the unique properties of our world, and now we must adjust to the thought that many different worlds are possible," Linde said. But he sees an advantage in what some others could see as a problem: "We finally learned that the inflationary universe is not just a free lunch: It is an eternal feast where all possible dishes are served."

Source: Stanford University

Dupes of Non-Physical

Parallel World Travellers unite

Who is online