Dupes of Non-Physical

You know it is the craziest thing of all, THERE is NO reason that it works this way, so at the best it falls under the anomly catagory. Those who do not notice the anomly are not subject to their outccome.

Cold fusion will be AN answer but maybe not for everyone, they have to embrace the concept, but that would be by default at that point.

Get Happy and let everyone else eat Cake.

Great querry
Much Love
iON

Jukebox is jammin'
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SLY7yI1xV-M

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A4ULwkahjIY

Alley UP

iOn "contrast lets you know what you do want, therefore questioning the contrast is the way to best benefit from the process of Creation at hand".

Well I just saw you slipped this little pearl in the oily oyster Mr. 2 Syllable, I think it was hiding!!!!. To question the contrasting blue water and brown sludge leaves me with what and how and where and a bunch of whys, closely followed by WTBFD all about. No I’m not saying to go analytical or apathetic here (no new government) but the statement begets some ‘questioning’, bravo.
Huna Buna Man
Ggg

Beautiful statement, was there a question? WE missed it if there is. Pearls are cool especially Platinum label Mikkemotos, they rock and presented correctly much lubrication is wrought. Way Phun


Hank

Definition of 'Questioning':

perplexed (as if being expected to know something that you do not know); "he had a quizzical expression"
doubting: marked by or given to doubt; "a skeptical attitude"; "a skeptical listener"
a request for information
inquisitive: showing curiosity; "if someone saw a man climbing a light post they might get inquisitive"; "raised a speculative eyebrow" wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn

Ohh these are good iOn. To doubt your contrast, be skeptical of your contrast, almost as if, oooooo hold on here, the contrast might not be valid.

Beautiful wordy words, WAS THERE A QUESTION?

shiney shiney pearly pearls
Hank

Is questioning the contrast a way of looking at it from duality, from another point of view in a way to keep it fluid and not solidified in your mind? Are rules formed from contrast, comment please.

So if that is done we do not freeze it in our now and allow it to morph, change or disappear?
Am I on the right track here?
(no longer thinking out loud)!!!
ComeonIwanalayyu.
Ggg

It can, but does not validate the dual positioning. Solidification is by default, or fluidity of the mind has nothing to do with the thought, can't mix the fruits of the Spirit. No, Rules are guides, set by YOU to make "sence" of the not main stream meme.

So close you can taste it. What, to you, would be the causal affect of allowing "it" to morph, change, or disappear? We don't require an answer, however your answer is the answer.
WE can play, Love to play, it will be much easier if you have a thought without overlaying the ends visa vie the conceptual view! So it is much better for you to just ask a direct question without all the protraction because for US it sets US into wordy play mode, and the outcome gets you there, but sometimes not via the FASTEST Path. It is OK with US, hey some like it ruff.


Thank You, you marvelous manifestor you

Matt Dillon, Miss Kitty's Bud

So am I correct in knowing that I am in charge of 'it'' morphing and to what I want it to morph tooooooo.
Does questioning contrast take me to a new place of consideration?
Noticing an anomoly can do the same thing correct?
No rules are guides, please elaborate iOn.