Dupes of Non-Physical

http://www.laroucheplanet.info/pmwiki/p ... y.UnityNow

[... That the tiny NCLC's long courtship of the American military elite ended in failure is not surprising. What is important for us is the way that the attempted connection to the military-just as with the NCLC's attempted alliances with the Liberty Lobby - further distorted the organization politically. On the one hand, the NCLC throughout the 1970s was ostensibly a pro-Soviet and pro-East Bloc organization that even applauded the most hard-line elements behind the Iron Curtin. On the other hand, LaRouche also desperately tried to find some kind of base inside the bitterly anti-Soviet American far right and military-industrial complex.

To try to justify his impossible attempt to pander to two diametrically opposite social blocs, LaRouche announced that the categories of "left" and "right" were actually mythological and that real politics was a "secret known only to the inner elite." Yet his attempt to get anyone outside of the small circle of the NCLC itself to accept his view was a total failure. It also led to such convoluted attempts to rationalize NCLC policy such as this gem from a 2 January 1976 NS article: "All indications suggest that the so-called anti-detente faction is in fact pro-peace, although it consists of Cold War psychosis-hardened paranoiacs."

... Given just how bizarre the NCLC had become after 1973, its activities could give rise to any number of conspiratorial views as to LaRouche's "real" motive from arguments that stressed that he was a secret Neo-Nazi agent to claims that the NCLC was really a sophisticated Soviet Bloc intelligence gathering operation.]

From UP THE ORPHIC ANTI by Bob Dobbs (1995):

http://www.fivebodied.com/archives/audi ... 20Anti.htm

[... Of course, tetrad-management swallows up the first four modalities and that fact is illustrated in my book with the excerpts from my rantings laid out symbolically on both the right-side and left-side pages of the book. Why are the others confined to one side or the other of the book? Well, each is a micro-tetrad-manager, i.e. "cynical", within their own archetypal stage and hence flip into cliche-probes for their associates and us....]


Bob Dobbs