angela wrote:
obviously u do
Of course I do. I like Wilcock. I read the entire article,
and listened to the entire interview.
I'm human. I love the guy.
I've read his stuff for some time, and I know he's sincere.
I wasn't making a statement about you, specifically, at all.
I want to make that clear.
I'm not making a statement (i.e., value judgment) about
anyone at all. Least of all Wilcock.
My statement was about getting involved in drama played
out on the Internet, or on television, etc.
It was intended as a catalyst to clarify this aspect of getting
involved in outside dramas and maybe to clear up the issue.
Are they human dramas? Yes. Are they real? Yes.
Do we wish to see people tormented? No.
My statement was sensational for a reason.
Maybe someone will take up the issue and clear up
what our perspective should be with regard to the chip,
or TV bodies.
The issue is more relevant at this moment than it ever
was.
What is our relationship to those five feet away, or five
hundred miles away?
There's clearly a code of conduct (propriety) when making
reference to events that befall other people?
I'd like to get around the proper conduct issue and get to
the subject of the most serviceable approach we can have
as unfolding events increase in intensity and scope.
This is sort of where I was heading.
My statement wasn't intended to mean that I'm glad this befell
Wilcock, but these sorts of dramas are going to continue to play
out and intensify, both on the Internet, on television and with
those around us.
This is the tip of the iceberg. I suggest it's best to straighten
one's position on their perspective / approach to these things.
This just as easily applies to the events of 9-11.
Any thoughts?
Sorry, Angela. No harm, or bad feelings intended.
I think the subject is important.
I'm detached from all of these things. Did this mean Wilcock's
breaking down affected me any less? No, I felt his torment.
That exchange was profound and moving.
Given this, however, is there an approach one can take as regards
even greater events unfolding "out there"?
iON's always spoken of the appropriate consideration of the
outer kingdom, which is none. Our attention should be in our
middle kingdom / now.
Bob reflected on a conversation he'd had with J.W. about the
Haiti incident, where many perished. Bob said J.W.'s response
was something like, "Wow. Cool." Totally normal, and totally
detached.
Does this cast J.W. in a poor light? No. I feel it's relevant to
flesh this out.
I realize this is simply a phatic exchange, but again, we're here,
so why not?
I'm taking iON's firm, frank stance here. Promise I'll go back to
Dr. Jekyll here shortly. haha